<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Home on a Range</title>
	<link>http://www.truliablog.com/2006/10/11/home-on-a-range/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: PlanOpen</title>
		<link>http://www.truliablog.com/2006/10/11/home-on-a-range/#comment-68317</link>
		<dc:creator>PlanOpen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 18:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.truliablog.com/2006/10/11/home-on-a-range/#comment-68317</guid>
		<description>No price is ever set! A range gives the buyer an idea that they may save a lot on a property that is actually wroth a lot more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No price is ever set! A range gives the buyer an idea that they may save a lot on a property that is actually wroth a lot more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amber</title>
		<link>http://www.truliablog.com/2006/10/11/home-on-a-range/#comment-1311</link>
		<dc:creator>amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 22:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.truliablog.com/2006/10/11/home-on-a-range/#comment-1311</guid>
		<description>This comment has been removed because it is off topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This comment has been removed because it is off topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.truliablog.com/2006/10/11/home-on-a-range/#comment-1221</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 17:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.truliablog.com/2006/10/11/home-on-a-range/#comment-1221</guid>
		<description>range pricing seems rather silly to me, especially in a falling or stagnant market  you've already signaled to the buyer a low-end value that you're willing to accept is, and w/ the san diego market being as slow as it is, i can't see it doing any good.  buyers seem lucky to get an offer at all, so i don't know what sense the range makes.  i remember learning the #1 rule of price negotiation is that the first side to mention the price sets the ceiling, and in this market i would consider the lower number in the price range to be the ceiling in my offer and negotiations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>range pricing seems rather silly to me, especially in a falling or stagnant market  you&#8217;ve already signaled to the buyer a low-end value that you&#8217;re willing to accept is, and w/ the san diego market being as slow as it is, i can&#8217;t see it doing any good.  buyers seem lucky to get an offer at all, so i don&#8217;t know what sense the range makes.  i remember learning the #1 rule of price negotiation is that the first side to mention the price sets the ceiling, and in this market i would consider the lower number in the price range to be the ceiling in my offer and negotiations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
